Starting both hosts after U2 fails to decrypt a stored slave API key: the row was encrypted under the old file-based key ring, and the database key ring holds a different, freshly generated key. The key ring working correctly is exactly why the old key is not found. U2 moved the ring without a path for ciphertext that predates it. Confirmed with the user that nothing is deployed yet, so no migration ships and the first deploy meets an empty database. ASM-08 records the condition and makes it blocking for U6 if it ever stops holding. Also notes that the master lets the CryptographicException escape while the slave catches it and reports "master API key rejected" instead — the ambiguity U4's event was designed around, showing up on day one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HHoJpxYXzHACSQguHrC5fw
7.3 KiB
Code Generation Summary — U2 Data Durability
Date: 2026-07-27 Requirements: FR-11, FR-12
Files Created
| Path | Purpose |
|---|---|
src/SlpModularCms.Core/Hosting/DataProtectionExtensions.cs |
AddCmsDataProtection() — database key ring, fixed discriminator |
src/SlpModularCms.Core/Hosting/DatabaseMigrationExtensions.cs |
MigrateCoreDatabase() — startup migration with failure classification |
src/SlpModularCms.Core/Migrations/20260727203036_AddDataProtectionKeys.cs |
Keys table migration |
src/SlpModularCms.Core.Tests/Hosting/DataProtectionExtensionsTests.cs |
4 tests |
src/SlpModularCms.Core.Tests/Hosting/DatabaseMigrationExtensionsTests.cs |
7 tests |
src/SlpModularCms.Modules.Availability.Tests/AvailabilityModuleDataProtectionTests.cs |
1 test |
src/SlpModularCms.Modules.Master.Tests/MasterModuleDataProtectionTests.cs |
1 test |
Files Modified
| Path | Change |
|---|---|
src/SlpModularCms.Core/SlpModularCms.Core.csproj |
Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.EntityFrameworkCore 10.0.9 |
src/SlpModularCms.Core/Data/ApplicationDbContext.cs |
Implements IDataProtectionKeyContext; DataProtectionKeys set |
src/SlpModularCms.Modules.Availability/AvailabilityModule.cs |
AddDataProtection() removed |
src/SlpModularCms.Modules.Master/MasterModule.cs |
AddDataProtection() removed |
src/SlpModularCms.Api/Program.cs |
AddCmsDataProtection() before module registration; MigrateCoreDatabase() after build |
src/SlpModularCms.Api.Slave/Program.cs |
Same |
No duplicate or parallel files were created.
Implementation Decisions
The removals are the point of this unit, so they are commented in place
Deleting services.AddDataProtection() from two modules looks like a regression to anyone who does not know the ordering issue. Both call sites therefore carry a comment explaining that the host owns Data Protection and that a bare call here would silently discard the persistent key store.
The tests assert configuration, not registration
A test asserting "Data Protection is registered" passes in both the broken and fixed cases, because IDataProtector resolves either way. Every test here inspects the resulting configuration instead:
KeyManagementOptions.XmlRepositoryisEntityFrameworkCoreXmlRepository<ApplicationDbContext>— not the filesystem defaultDataProtectionOptions.ApplicationDiscriminatoris the fixed constant — not the path-derived default- A protected value survives a simulated restart from a different release directory, which is the property that actually matters
- The discriminator contains no path separator, guarding against a future "improvement" that makes it computed or configurable
The module-level tests live in each module's own test project rather than in Core.Tests, because Core.Tests does not reference the modules. Each registers the host's Data Protection first and the module second — the real ordering — and asserts the EF repository survives.
SqlException is produced genuinely, not faked
SqlException has no public constructor. Rather than substituting a stand-in type, the test provokes a real one by opening a connection to an unreachable host with a one-second timeout. The classifier is therefore exercised against the exact type it will meet in production.
Wrong credentials are classified as a connection failure
Distinguishing bad credentials from an unreachable server would add branching for no benefit: retries are exhausted and the process does not start either way. The simpler classification is the honest one.
Migration verified as additive
The generated migration only creates a table — no dropped or narrowed columns. Rollback by redeploying an earlier release therefore stays safe, which BR-U2-16 requires and which the whole rollback strategy depends on.
Operational Constraints Enforced by Documentation, Not Code
Both were decided deliberately (U2 FD Q4 = C, Q5 = C). They must appear in the Operations deployment instructions:
| Constraint | Why it is not enforced in code |
|---|---|
The DataProtectionKeys table must never be pruned. Deleting a key makes every value encrypted with it permanently unreadable, including stored slave API keys. |
Nothing in the application deletes these rows; the risk comes from a human treating the table as housekeeping. It is the single most destructive maintenance action available against this system, and it looks harmless. |
| Only one instance may migrate a given database at a time. | One instance per database holds by design today — the Master and each slave have their own. A distributed migration lock would add failure modes without removing any. If the deployment model ever changes to multiple instances sharing a database, automatic startup migration must be revisited before that change is made. |
Also recorded for Operations: DEV-05 — keys are stored unencrypted at rest, with TLS on the database connection and a non-public database as the compensating controls (BR-U2-08). These are not optional extras; they are what makes the deviation acceptable.
Verification
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
dotnet build SlpModularCms.sln -c Release |
✅ 0 errors |
SlpModularCms.Core.Tests |
✅ 83 passed |
SlpModularCms.Modules.Availability.Tests |
✅ 82 passed |
SlpModularCms.Modules.Identity.Tests |
✅ 37 passed |
SlpModularCms.Modules.Master.Tests |
✅ 51 passed |
| Migration is purely additive | ✅ Inspected — creates one table, drops nothing |
No failures occurred during generation.
Not verifiable at this stage: the composed startup path (MigrateCoreDatabase against a real database, and both hosts actually starting) requires SQL Server. Carried to the phase-level Build and Test stage.
Follow-up found in local testing (2026-07-28)
Starting both hosts after U2 produced, on the master:
CryptographicException: The key {2ad1bf17-...} was not found in the key ring
at ApiKeyProtector.Unprotect
at CmsInstanceService.VerifyIntegrityAsync
Not a defect in this unit — it is this unit's change meeting data written before it. The stored
MasterCmsInstances.ApiKey had been encrypted under the old file-based key ring in
%LOCALAPPDATA%\ASP.NET\DataProtection-Keys; both databases now hold their own freshly generated
single key, which cannot decrypt it. The key ring working correctly is precisely why the old key is
not found.
The gap this unit left: no one-time path for ciphertext that predates the move. Recorded as
ASM-08 in requirements.md. Confirmed with the user on 2026-07-28 that the CMS is not deployed
anywhere yet, so the first deploy meets an empty database and no migration is shipped. If that ever
stops being true, U6 must not deploy until either the affected rows are cleared and the instances
re-registered, or this unit gains a fallback that reads the old ring and re-encrypts.
Resolved locally by deleting the one stale row on each side and re-registering the slave.
Worth noting for U4's alerting: the two sides fail differently. Modules.Master/ApiKeyProtector
lets the exception escape, while Modules.Availability/MasterApiKeyProtector catches it and returns
null, so the slave reports "master API key rejected" instead. That is exactly the ambiguity U4's
MasterApiKeyRejected event documents — an intruder, or an unreadable key ring — occurring in
practice.