Files

T

Sluijsens 9ab30fe2a6 Closes construction - build and test across all seven units

Unit suites already passed individually; this is the full solution
together plus what none of them could check alone: two real hosts
talking to each other, a slave API key encrypted by one process and
decrypted by the next one after a restart, and headers landing on
actual static files instead of a simulated response.

2026-07-28 16:47:45 +02:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

Build and Test Summary

Date: 2026-07-28

Build Status

Build Tool: .NET 10 SDK (dotnet build), pnpm 9 / Vite (pnpm run build)
Build Status: Success — dotnet build SlpModularCms.sln -c Release, 0 errors, 12 warnings (all pre-existing NU1510 "will not be pruned" informational notices)
Build Artifacts: standard per-project bin/Release/net10.0/ output; frontend/dist/
Build Time: ~15s backend, ~1s frontend (incremental)

Test Execution Summary

Unit Tests

Total Tests: 609 (372 backend + 237 frontend)
Passed: 609
Failed: 0
Coverage: not tracked (D-10 — deliberate, no threshold enforced)
Status: Pass

Integration Tests

Test Scenarios: 4 (static content/SPA-fallback/header-scoping, master↔slave real communication over the persistent key ring, correlation-ID logging, startup behaviour) — see integration-test-instructions.md for the full scenario table
Passed: 4/4 scenarios, all individual checks within them passed
Failed: 0
Status: Pass
Method: both hosts (SlpModularCms.Api, SlpModularCms.Api.Slave) run live against the local SQL Server container, admin SPA published and served for real, verified with direct HTTP requests rather than simulated HttpContext — the specific gap unit tests structurally cannot close, per U1/U2/U3's own carried-forward Definition of Done items

Performance Tests

Status: N/A — no performance/throughput requirements exist for this feature (see performance-test-instructions.md)

Additional Tests

Contract Tests: N/A — no microservice boundary changed by this feature; the U5↔U6 workflow_call interface is validated by YAML structure checks during Code Generation, not a runtime contract test
Security Tests: Vulnerability scan — dotnet list SlpModularCms.sln package --vulnerable --include-transitive — 0 vulnerable packages across all 10 projects (was 2 packages, multiple advisories each, closed at U5 — FR-22, OPEN-03)
E2E Tests: covered by the integration scenarios above (real requests through a real host); no browser-driven UI E2E suite exists for the admin SPA in this repository

Overall Status

Build: Success
All Tests: Pass
Ready for Operations: Yes

What This Stage Confirmed That Per-Unit Checks Could Not

Static-file serving and SPA-fallback actually work end-to-end with real published output, not just against DefaultHttpContext (U1)
HTTP security headers are correctly scoped by content type on real responses — HTML gets the full set, non-HTML gets only the always-on pair, confirmed on genuine static assets and the /health JSON response (U3)
The persistent Data Protection key ring genuinely survives a process restart: a slave API key encrypted by an earlier process was successfully decrypted and used for authenticated master↔slave calls by a freshly started process (U2, closing the loop on ASM-08)
The W3C trace id correlation mechanism is present in real console log output (U4, OPEN-01)

What Remains Genuinely Out of Scope for This Stage

Real Sentry events, real UptimeRobot monitors, an actual Gitea pipeline run against the self-hosted runner, and a real Raspberry Pi deploy — all explicitly deferred to the Operations phase by U5 and U6's own Definition of Done, because they require infrastructure (a live Sentry project, a live Gitea instance, the actual Pi with SSH access) that does not exist yet at this stage of the workflow.

Next Steps

Ready to proceed to the Operations phase (Deployment Setup → Monitoring Setup → Production Readiness Validation), per this feature's ## Operations Configuration: Include Operations Phase: Yes (decided at Requirements Analysis).

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History