# Build and Test Summary — Local Dev Master/Slave Setup

## Build Status
- **Build Tool**: .NET 10 SDK (`dotnet build`)
- **Build Status**: ✅ Success
- **Build Artifacts**: `src/SlpModularCms.Api.Slave/bin/` (new), plus unchanged outputs for all existing projects
- **Build Time**: ~5 seconds (incremental)

## Test Execution Summary

### Unit Tests
- **Total Tests**: 193 (54 + 60 + 37 + 42 across `Core.Tests`, `Modules.Availability.Tests`, `Modules.Identity.Tests`, `Modules.Master.Tests`)
- **Passed**: 193
- **Failed**: 0
- **Coverage**: Unchanged from before this feature (no new business logic; relocated code retains its existing tests)
- **Status**: ✅ Pass

### Integration Tests
- **Test Scenarios**: 2 (module isolation; end-to-end master/slave connection via existing Add CMS Instance flow)
- **Passed**: 1 (module isolation — verified via manual `dotnet run` of both hosts, confirmed via log output: master loads 3 modules, slave loads exactly 2, Master excluded)
- **Failed**: 0
- **Not Run**: 1 (end-to-end connection scenario — requires a local SQL Server instance; no container runtime available in this sandboxed session. Documented as a manual step for the developer in `integration-test-instructions.md` and the root `README.md` runbook.)
- **Status**: ⚠️ Partial — the scenario this feature actually changes (module isolation) is fully verified; the scenario exercising the pre-existing, unmodified master/slave protocol requires manual follow-up.

### Performance Tests
- **Status**: N/A — this feature is local developer tooling with no performance requirements (NFR-3, local-only scope).

### Additional Tests
- **Contract Tests**: N/A — no API contracts changed
- **Security Tests**: N/A — no new attack surface; `appsettings.local.json` secrets-hygiene pattern (NFR-4) followed and verified via `git check-ignore`
- **E2E Tests**: See Integration Tests Scenario 2 above

## Overall Status
- **Build**: ✅ Success
- **All Automated Tests**: ✅ Pass (193/193)
- **Manual Follow-up Required**: Yes — developer should run the end-to-end connection test (root `README.md`, "Lokaal Master + Slave Draaien (Dev)") at least once with a real local SQL Server to confirm the full workflow before relying on it.
- **Ready for Operations**: Yes (Operations is a placeholder for this project; no deployment/monitoring work applicable to local dev tooling)

## Next Steps
- Developer runs the manual end-to-end verification (Scenario 2) locally to close out the one remaining unverified item.
- Feature is otherwise complete: `SlpModularCms.Api.Slave` exists and correctly excludes the Master module, `SlpModularCms.Core.Hosting` avoids code duplication between the two hosts, frontend tooling and documentation are in place.