2026-07-25 20:04:18 +02:00
5 changed files with 17 additions and 5 deletions
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
 - **Feature Slug**: react-frontend
 - **Project Type**: Greenfield
 - **Start Date**: 2026-07-18T00:37:00Z
- **Current Stage**: OPERATIONS - Monitoring Setup (in progress)
- **Branch**: master
+- **Current Stage**: Complete (post-completion follow-ups tracked in `audit.md` / `operations/production-readiness-checklist.md`)
+- **Branch**: feature/sentry_error_logging

 ## Workspace State
 - **Existing Code**: No
@@ -552,3 +552,15 @@
 **Context**: Post-workflow follow-up (feature already marked Complete); continues the `feature/sentry_error_logging` branch, ensuring no local changes are left uncommitted/untracked.

 ---
+
+## Post-Completion Follow-up: Sentry Logging Follow-up Confirmed Working & Closed
+
+**Timestamp**: 2026-07-25T16:04:00Z
+
+**User Input**: "het werkt zoals ik zou verwachten. De feature mag afgerond worden. De documentatie updaten en committen. Dan door naar het volgende openstaande punt en ook daarvoor een feature branch aanmaken."
+
+**AI Response**: "User confirmed Sentry (errors, logs, and metrics via the tunnel) works as expected, both locally and on the test environment. Updated `monitoring-setup.md`, `monitoring-plan.md`, and `production-readiness-checklist.md` to mark the 'client-side error logging destination' open follow-up as resolved and verified end-to-end, leaving only the manual `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` Gitea repository variable creation as an outstanding step for the test/production build. Also corrected `aidlc-state.md`'s stale `Current Stage`/`Branch` fields to reflect that the workflow is complete and work is happening on `feature/sentry_error_logging`."
+
+**Context**: Closes out the Sentry logging-destination follow-up. Three open follow-ups remain per `production-readiness-checklist.md`: production hosting/deploy, analytics/uptime dashboard tool selection, and a formal Lighthouse performance check.
+
+---
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ A combination of:
 - **Reuse of existing infrastructure**: this feature does not plug into any pre-existing shared monitoring (original Question 7 = A) — there is none yet. Should a shared back-end/CMS monitoring stack be introduced later, this can be revisited.

 ## Open Action Items
-1. ~~Decide logging destination~~ — **Resolved**: Sentry free tier, wired into `ErrorBoundary`/`main.tsx` (see `monitoring-setup.md`). The Gitea Actions variable `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` still needs to be created by the user with a real Sentry project DSN; until then the build simply skips Sentry initialization and only console-logging is active.
+1. ~~Decide logging destination~~ — **Resolved and verified**: Sentry free tier, wired into `ErrorBoundary`/`main.tsx` (see `monitoring-setup.md`), including tracing, environment/release tags, and a tunnel to bypass ad-blocker blocking. The user confirmed errors, logs, and metrics are received correctly, both locally and on the test environment. The Gitea Actions variable `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` still needs to be created by the user with a real Sentry project DSN for the test/production build; until then that build simply skips Sentry initialization and only console-logging is active (local development already has its own DSN via `.env.local`).
 2. **Pick concrete analytics + uptime tools**: `monitoring-setup.md` lists candidate free-tier tools; final tool selection/account creation is a manual follow-up outside this workflow (no code changes required to swap providers, since neither is wired into the codebase yet beyond an optional embed snippet).

 ## Rationale
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Pick one:

 | Concern | Approach | Status |
 |---|---|---|
-| Client-side errors | Logging (console + Sentry free tier) | Implemented; `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` Gitea variable still needs to be created by the user |
+| Client-side errors | Logging (console + Sentry free tier, incl. tracing, environment/release tags, and an ad-blocker-proof tunnel) | Implemented and confirmed working end-to-end (errors, logs, and metrics received) locally and on the test environment; the `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` Gitea repository variable still needs to be created by the user for the test/production build to report to Sentry (local already works via `.env.local`) |
 | Visitor/usage insight | Analytics dashboard (Plausible/Umami/GA4) | Tool selection open item |
 | Site reachability | Uptime dashboard (UptimeRobot/Better Uptime) | Tool selection + production URL open item |
 | Alerting | Out of scope | Not configured |
@@ -19,6 +19,6 @@
 - **Ready for Production**: Yes with caveats
 - **Open Follow-ups**:
  - Finalize the hosting/domain setup and extend `.gitea/workflows/deploy.yml`'s `deploy` job to actually upload `dist/` to the host, instead of only packaging it as a downloadable artifact (see `deployment-plan.md` "Open Item")
-  - ~~Decide the client-side error logging destination~~ — **Resolved**: console + Sentry free tier, implemented (see `monitoring-setup.md`); remaining manual step is creating the `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` Gitea Actions variable
+  - ~~Decide the client-side error logging destination~~ — **Resolved and verified**: console + Sentry free tier, implemented and confirmed working end-to-end (errors, logs, metrics) locally and on the test environment, including tracing, environment/release tags, and an ad-blocker-proof tunnel (see `monitoring-setup.md`); remaining manual step is creating the `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` Gitea Actions variable for the test/production build
  - Pick and configure the concrete analytics tool (e.g. Plausible/Umami/GA4) and uptime dashboard tool (e.g. UptimeRobot/Better Uptime), including registering the final production URL once hosting is finalized
  - Run a formal Lighthouse performance check before the first real production deployment (flagged as not yet run in `build-and-test-summary.md`)