Rond Sentry logging-follow-up af: bevestigd werkend, documentatie bijgewerkt
Continuous Integration / config (pull_request) Successful in 11s
Continuous Integration / prepare (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Continuous Integration / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m54s
Continuous Integration / test (pull_request) Successful in 1m47s
Continuous Integration / deploy-test (pull_request) Skipped

Co-authored-by: Junie <junie@jetbrains.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-25 16:05:56 +02:00
co-authored by Junie
parent 708d89905c
commit 9732791d09
5 changed files with 17 additions and 5 deletions
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ A combination of:
- **Reuse of existing infrastructure**: this feature does not plug into any pre-existing shared monitoring (original Question 7 = A) — there is none yet. Should a shared back-end/CMS monitoring stack be introduced later, this can be revisited.
## Open Action Items
1. ~~Decide logging destination~~**Resolved**: Sentry free tier, wired into `ErrorBoundary`/`main.tsx` (see `monitoring-setup.md`). The Gitea Actions variable `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` still needs to be created by the user with a real Sentry project DSN; until then the build simply skips Sentry initialization and only console-logging is active.
1. ~~Decide logging destination~~**Resolved and verified**: Sentry free tier, wired into `ErrorBoundary`/`main.tsx` (see `monitoring-setup.md`), including tracing, environment/release tags, and a tunnel to bypass ad-blocker blocking. The user confirmed errors, logs, and metrics are received correctly, both locally and on the test environment. The Gitea Actions variable `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` still needs to be created by the user with a real Sentry project DSN for the test/production build; until then that build simply skips Sentry initialization and only console-logging is active (local development already has its own DSN via `.env.local`).
2. **Pick concrete analytics + uptime tools**: `monitoring-setup.md` lists candidate free-tier tools; final tool selection/account creation is a manual follow-up outside this workflow (no code changes required to swap providers, since neither is wired into the codebase yet beyond an optional embed snippet).
## Rationale
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Pick one:
| Concern | Approach | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Client-side errors | Logging (console + Sentry free tier) | Implemented; `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` Gitea variable still needs to be created by the user |
| Client-side errors | Logging (console + Sentry free tier, incl. tracing, environment/release tags, and an ad-blocker-proof tunnel) | Implemented and confirmed working end-to-end (errors, logs, and metrics received) locally and on the test environment; the `VITE_SENTRY_DSN` Gitea repository variable still needs to be created by the user for the test/production build to report to Sentry (local already works via `.env.local`) |
| Visitor/usage insight | Analytics dashboard (Plausible/Umami/GA4) | Tool selection open item |
| Site reachability | Uptime dashboard (UptimeRobot/Better Uptime) | Tool selection + production URL open item |
| Alerting | Out of scope | Not configured |